![]() The study sample included 897 participants who were distributed into two main subgroups: (I) the clinical group (90 patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment, 90 patients with Alzheimer's disease, 33 patients with Frontotemporal Dementia, and 34 patients with Vascular dementia, whose diagnoses were previously established according to a consensus that was reached by a multidisciplinary team, based on the international criteria) and (II) the healthy group (composed of 650 cognitively healthy community dwellers). 10.The psychometric properties of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) were examined by using the Partial Credit Model. Reliability of the interRAI suite of assessment instruments: a 12-country study of an integrated health information system. Hirdes JP, Ljunggren G, Morris JN, Frijters DH, Soveri HF, Gray L, et al. Washington, DC: interRAI publications (2010). InterRAI Clinical Assessment Protocols (CAPs) for use with Community and Long-Term Care Assessment Instruments. Instrument i, Systems Development Committee, Morris JN, Belleville-Taylor P. Using interRAI assessment systems to measure and maintain quality of long-term care. Washington, DC: interRAI publications (2020).Ĭarpenter I, Hirdes JP. InterRAI Long-Term Care Facilities (LTCF) Assessment Form and User's Manual. Morris JN, Berg K, Bjorkgren M, Costa AP, Declercq A, Finne-Soveri UH, et al. Morris JN, Fries BE, Mehr DR, Hawes C, Phillips C, Mor V, et al. MoCA 5-min cognitive performance scale cognitive screening crosswalk test equating.Ĭopyright © 2021 Andersson, Luo, Wong and Lum. This enabled continuity in repeated assessment with different tools and improved comparability of cognitive scores generated from different tools from diverse populations and research cohorts. ![]() ![]() Conclusions: We provided score conversions between MoCA 5-min and CPS/CPS2 within a large cohort of Hong Kong older adults with mild physical or cognitive impairment. The linking functions revealed the floor and ceiling effects that exist for the different scales, with CPS and CPS2 measuring more-severe cognitive impairment while the MoCA 5-min was better suited to measure mild impairment. At the higher end, a CPS score of 3 (moderately impaired) and a CPS2 score of 5 (moderately impaired Level-2) corresponded to MoCA 5-min scores of 0 and 1, respectively. A CPS or CPS2 score of 0 (intact cognition) corresponds to MoCA 5-min scores of 24 and 25, respectively. Results: 3,543 participants had valid data on both scales 66% were female and their average age was 78.9 years (SD = 8.2). We performed equipercentile linking with bivariate log-linear smoothing to establish equivalent scores between the two scales. Each participant's cognitive performance was assessed using CPS, CPS Version 2 (CPS2), and MoCA 5-min. The program used the interRAI-Check Up instrument for needs assessment and service matching between 20. Methods: We included individual-level data from persons who participated in a home- and community-based care program for older people with mild impairment in Hong Kong. This study linked scores from the Montreal Cognitive Assessment-5 min (MoCA 5-min) to the interRAI cognitive Performance Scale (CPS), commonly adopted tools in clinical and long-term care settings, respectively. Background: Bridging scores generated from different cognitive assessment tools is necessary to efficiently track changes in cognition across the continuum of care.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |